MAIL ROOM SECURITY / BIO ATTACKS / A SOLUTION IS HERE

BIO-CHEMICAL BUSINESS ATTACKS

$12.1 million TO OPEN NEW OFFICES –
.41 cent STAMP TO SHUT THEM DOWN

Corporate offices, schools, industry, manufacturing plants, governmental offices, the offices of former President William Jefferson Clinton and even Presidential Candidate John Edwards have all fallen victim to “WHITE POWDER” mail threats, hoaxes and attacks. These are not random acts of violence, but rather a selected controlled attack on the institution, corporation or person.

www.CrimeTalkAmerica.com reports our investigation to enlighten the reader, educate the corporate executive and explore our F3IR newest product to protect your business and life. While I try to make sure that Crime Talk America is independent of our consulting business, I find it EXTREMELY IMPORTANT that you the business reader, the crime talk reader and corporations within America and others from around the world that visit our site consider prevention and protection mode which is essential and NOW available.

Just after the 9/11/2001 attack on America, several news agencies, politicians, businesses and governmental agencies fell victim to an onslaught of U.S. Mail envelopes delivered that contained white powder substances. Most were false or hoax mailings. Some were not. We will never know how many of these attacks were real, but it really doesn’t matter, its VERY DISRUPTIVE to business and the individuals involved.

Let’s consider the American Media offices in Boca Raton, Florida. This world famous news agency fell victim to an anthrax attack that took the life of Robert Stevens, a photo editor with the Sun. He took ill after approximately five days. Examination by doctors at John F. Kennedy Hospital determined that he had contracted ANTHRAX. The CDC confirmed that it was anthrax. Mr,. Steven died on October 5, 2001, just a few days after becoming ill.

Upon specific tests of American Media employees, it was determined that two others tested positive. All employees of American Media were tested. The results were positive for five other employees. Those identified as having contracted anthrax exposure were hospitalized and treated and recovered.

The Florida Department of Health announces that it had discovered minuscule amounts of Anthrax spores were found in the Boca Raton Post Office. During the same period, Anthrax was sent to NBC television in New York. It was determined that this was the same as the Boca Raton anthrax.

The American Media building was closed, sealed off and guarded from any public visitors or employees. CDC members and FBI investigators explored the building wearing protective hazardous material suits.

Three years after the closing of the American Media building, the building received approval for cleaning. It took several more years to declare the building as a safe environment. It was just a .37 cent U.S. Postal Stamp that shut down a billion dollar empire.

In 2006, five years after the 9/11 attack and the Anthrax attack on American Media, NBC, Congressmen and governmental buildings, former President William Jefferson Clinton’s offices located in the heart of Harlem, New York received an envelope filled with white powder. This caused two floors of the building to be shut down. Most of the building was evacuated by New York Police but eleven people were quarantined as the police, FBI, Secret Service, Fire Department and Homeland Security responded to the building. It turned out that the white powder was not toxic, and was harmless but another disruption to businesses and people.

Anthrax hoaxes and attacks are worldwide. More than 750 such incidents have been reported around the world in 2001 and continue today. ABC News offices were victimized, Senate offices were attacked, and abortion clinics also receive these letters. More than 17 people came down with symptoms of anthrax attack around the world.

These attacks whether a Hoax or Real are ongoing today and are used to terrorize business and individuals more than ever.

While some would argue that many of the envelopes were a HOAX, its still extremely disruptive to business and law enforcement. It takes time away from business operations, creates fear by employees and can shut down a billion dollar business in a matter of seconds.

We at www.CrimeTalkAmerica.com have discovered the only actual solution to cleaning incoming mail to businesses and governmental agencies. F3International Resources, our Consulting Group, has reached an agreement to represent the Bio Chemical Cleaner to our corporate and government clients.

I decided after receiving several inquiries from our readers on how to help protect their businesses, to offer this information. It is extremely important so I decided to present this great new protective counter chemical attack measure to protect your business, offices and government agencies from that .43 cent postal stamp attack,.

Visit our www.F3IR.com website, Products section for details. It’s a great protective resource.

NIFONG UPDATE! - DISBARED FOR FRAUDULENT BEHAVIOR

NIFONG UPDATE

DISBARED – FOR FRAUDULENT BEHAVIOR

WHO ELSE WAS PARTY TO THIS SCHAM


June 16, 2007 the North Carolina Bar Association after hearing found against Raleigh, North Carolina District Attorney Mike Nifong for committing amongst other technical legal infractions, fraudulent behavior in the Prosecution of the Duke University Lacrosse Players.

As we reported on April 12, 2007, (* “Prosecutor Gone Wild”) has now been answered by the North Carolina Bar Association.

The way we see this, it’s not an isolated incident. Prosecutorial overzealous behavior has often been the case in criminal matters. Misrepresentations, fabrication of information, withholding crucial information, falsely accusing individuals and other incidents are often seen in many jurisdictions. However, in the Nifong matter, it was more than just bad prosecutorial behavior. Some would argue that this behavior was the result of his desire to be politically correct. A decision was made by Nifong to withhold certain information from the defendant’s attorneys and the court, while presenting to the court that such information did not exist. In the DNA matter, the dramatic turning point of the case, Nifong withheld the results from the defendants and their attorneys knowing that the DNA was not a match against the accused. It took forensic DNA evaluation to find that the rogue District Attorney was playing with the lives of three innocent Duke Students. It was an injustice to the entire University, the legal profession that a District Attorney and the people of Raleigh, North Carolina, that the Peoples Attorney would do anything possible to convict the innocent to favor himself with a selected community. It wasn’t a matter of black against white; it was a Nifong matter to ingratiate himself to the Black community that he serves with an upcoming election knocking at his backdoor.

The remaining question that CrimeTalkAmerica asks is; Who Else in the Raleigh, North Carolina District Attorney’s Office participated in the cover-up? Who knew what? Who DIDN”T STEP UP to bring the truth forward? They had a legal responsibility to tell the court and report the facts to the States Attorney General before it went as far as it did, to trial for the three students.

Nifong’s behavior was callus, indifferent and elitist. He apparently misunderstood his role in his service to the people. As an elected official, he represents all the people. The investigators in this matter were suspect of the claimant’s complaint, but followed the path of Nifong and his assistants.

This calls for a CLEAN SWEEP of the Raleigh, North Carolina’s Prosecutor’s Office, and those law enforcement official’s that participated, committed malfeasance and obstruction of justice. It calls for a sweeping Grand Jury Investigation into the behavior of not only Nifong, but the Assistant Prosecutor’s, Police Investigator’s and others in official capacity that ignored their sworn responsibility.

Not to say that the Duke students didn’t set themselves up for their own plight. Something that the university will have to deal with, however, the allegations from the beginning were suspect. The changing story of the claimant, the testimony of the fellow stripper, who denied that a rape had been committed, she had not seen a rape she claimed, and the lack of physical evidence, namely the DNA of any of the accused was the signal that the claimant was a questionable victim. While I would agree that the District Attorney’s office is required to investigate these serious allegations, the element of political expediency, racial complications and a naive District Attorney, all added up to a disaster, and a national disgrace of the legal prosecution profession in the State of North Carolina.

As the evidence mounted that questioned the claimant’s complaint, it was the responsibility of the prosecutor to examine all the facts, not turn his back on exculpatory evidence so that he could meet his political agenda.

Shame on the justice system that allow political expediency to be the decider in the prosecution of cases. Shame on the political animals that find it more important to withhold crucial data, evidence that would clear any individual.

Some years ago, I developed information about an individual that had been found guilty and was serving a 15 year sentence for Burglary and Arson. He was in his eighth year of his sentence, when I discovered that the Prosecuting Attorney in Brooklyn New York had withheld physical evidence, detailed statements from witnesses and physical crime scene evidence. This information was never presented to the defense attorney or the court. The information held by the prosecutor’s office CLEARED the defendant and presented information that would have proven that the original target of the investigation was the actual offender. It took eight years and a court hearing on the newly discovered evidence, (that the prosecutor had all along) before State of New York Court, to exonerate the defendant and have him released from prison. He lost eight years of his life, his family moved on, his children moved on and his employment was gone. All beacons of an overzealous prosecutorial and a prosecutor that ignored his legal responsibility to present all the facts known at the time.

To the State of North Carolina, I ask the Attorney General to conduct an independent Grand Jury to evaluate and prosecute any others in Nifong’s office that had knowledge but failed to STEP-UP for the integrity of the office and the law.

www.CrimeTalkAmerica.com recognizes that the majority of prosecutors are hard working, sometimes overworked, defenders of our legal system, citizen’s rights and a criminal’s worst enemy. We recognize also that there are some people who become prosecutors for political reasons, indifference to the rules of evidence, rules of procedures and rule of law for the benefit of their career. To this I say, step aside!

Mike Nifong, Prosecutors Gone Wild!

NIFONG
PROECUTORS GONE WILD!!


Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina –
Three Duke University students were finally out from under the nightmare of false prosecution by the Durham, North Carolina District Attorney, Mike Nifong. After more than a year under the gun as accused rapists, these three Duke Lacrosse team members and students are finally free.

What was NIFONG thinking?
Our justice system is based on the innocent be proven guilty “BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT”. Nifong appeared to do the case backwards. He found the students publicly guilty, using the media, elevating his public image as a crusader against crime and hate in the Raleigh Durham community.
On the surface, Nifong became trapped by his own words, months before the investigation was complete. He covered errors, ignored changes in statements by the alleged victim and hid the results of the DNA test, which exonerated the accused. NO MATCH! He also knew early on that the results of the rape test kit did not match the students. What was his motivation? www.CrimeTalkAmerica.com examined some of these questions as have others.

After careful review by the State of North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper dropped the charges when a special investigation found “significant inconsistencies between the evidence and the various accounts given by the accusing witness” He further found that the three students “are innocent” and that his own investigation “led us to the conclusion that no attack occurred.”

So after one year of being on the hot seat, these young men, had the cloud lifted? However, they will always be remembered as the “Duke Three”. While time will pass, the year has not only interrupted their education and life but that of their families and friends. All had true good spirits considering the year’s horrific experience. Perhaps they will now get on with life, and we at CrimeTalkAmerica hope that they NEVER sit back and accept our justice system as being fair and balanced.

This incident is not the first, but highlights, how the power of the Justice System can not only disrupt lives, but convict the innocent. We find at times convicted rapists; murderers and other criminals serving sentences are released after they’ve had a further examination of the facts, review of the evidence and independent DNA testing. How many have walked out of prison after professionals like the “INNOCENSE PROJECT” led by Attorney’s Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld, discovered factual data, DNA tests and other evidence. The answer is many across America.

What Nifong did is inexcusable. His “overreaching” in this case, questions the process and protections. Had the three students not have the family support, the financial ability to find private counsel to work and fight the D.A., and the ability to remain positive. Perhaps the less fortunate, they would be sentenced and sitting in a prison, careers and lives and families left in shambles.

What about Nifong? He’s still the District Attorney, with NO CREDABILITY. He must go! Any of his lieutenants, associates that were aiding in the cover-up also need to go!

CrimeTalkAmerica finds the need to have a citizen groups monitor and watch for overzealous prosecutors. Holding back exculpatory evidence is a common practice of prosecutors. Often, only after discovery of misbehavior, cover-ups and true facts, does the cooperation from the prosecutor occur. Defense Attorney’s often know the prosecutors that fudge the information, hide the truth and only want to put a check mark in the conviction box. They often look the other way.

What do you think? Let us know!!!